This is a follow-up inquiry to a (now-deleted) MSE question.
Here is my initial query:
Where is the fraction $\dfrac{c-a}{d-b}$ located with respect to $$\text{min}\left(\dfrac{a}{b},\dfrac{c}{d}\right)$$ and $$\text{max}\left(\dfrac{a}{b},\dfrac{c}{d}\right),$$ assuming $a$, $b$, $c$, and $d$ are all positive integers?
MY ATTEMPT
WLOG, we may assume that $b \neq 0$, $d \neq 0$ and $b \neq d$. Also, WLOG we can assume that $$\dfrac{a}{b} \leq \dfrac{c}{d}.$$
IF the equation $$\dfrac{a}{b} = \dfrac{c}{d}$$ holds, then we obtain $$\dfrac{a}{b} = \dfrac{c}{d} = \dfrac{a - c}{b - d}$$ since the last relationship holds if and only if $$\Bigg(a(b - d) = b(a - c)\Bigg) \land \Bigg(c(b - d) = d(a - c)\Bigg)$$ which is true if and only if $$\Bigg(ad = bc\Bigg) \land \Bigg(ad = bc\Bigg),$$ something which obviously holds.
Now, I claim that IF the inequality $$\dfrac{a}{b} < \dfrac{c}{d}$$ holds, then we have the inequality $$\text{min}\left(\dfrac{a}{b},\dfrac{c}{d}\right) = \dfrac{a}{b} < \dfrac{c - a}{d - b} < \dfrac{c}{d} = \text{max}\left(\dfrac{a}{b},\dfrac{c}{d}\right).$$
PROOF
Since $a$ and $b$ are positive (integers), then $$0 < \dfrac{a}{b} < \dfrac{c - a}{d - b} < \dfrac{c}{d}.$$
Subtracting and simplifying, we obtain $$\dfrac{a}{b} - \dfrac{c - a}{d - b} = \dfrac{ad - ab - bc + ab}{b(d - b)} = \dfrac{ad - bc}{b(d - b)} < 0,$$ which means that $b < d$. This implies that $a < c$.
We may now cross-multiply (without worrying about the signs): $$\dfrac{a}{b} < \dfrac{c - a}{d - b} \iff ad - ab = a(d - b) < b(c - a) = bc - ab \iff ad < bc$$ which is obviously true; and $$\dfrac{c - a}{d - b} < \dfrac{c}{d} \iff cd - ad = d(c - a) < c(d - b) = cd - bc \iff bc < ad,$$ which is false.
CONCLUSION
Hence, if the inequality $$\dfrac{a}{b} < \dfrac{c}{d}$$ holds, then what we actually have is the inequality $$\text{min}\left(\dfrac{a}{b},\dfrac{c}{d}\right) = \dfrac{a}{b} < \dfrac{c}{d} = \text{max}\left(\dfrac{a}{b},\dfrac{c}{d}\right) < \dfrac{c - a}{d - b}.$$
Here is my final query:
Is my argument above logically sound? If not, how can it be mended so as to produce a valid proof?
See my comments for elaborations on the 2 errors in your writeup.
A better way to present your work is (This is a sketch where you have to fill in the missing details)
Note: