I'm a post-graduate researcher in Telecommunications and am currently studying Geogeomatric stochastic's applications.
In the process of building systems, I faced the challenge of finding the minimum probability of multiple dependent random variables. Details of it can be explained as follows. As illustrated in the figure below, I have
- Node A (e.g., orange point) is uniformly random distributed in the red circle with radius $R$.
- Node $N$ node B (e.g., blue triangle) is uniformly random distributed in the red circle with radius $R$.
Thus, the predetermined probability density distribution (PDF) of the distance between A (or B$_n$, $n=1,2,..N$) and the origin can be easily formulated according to $R$. Here, I denote such these corresponding PDFs as $f_{d_{\rm OA}}(x)$ and $f_{d_{{\rm OB}_n}}(x)$.
My aim is to determine:
The PDF of the unknown distance between node A and one any node B$_n$, i.e., $f_{d_{{\rm AB}_n}}(x)$. In this case, I have fully derived $f_{d_{{\rm AB}_n}}(x)$, based on the conditional probability approach. Note, $f_{d_{{\rm AB}_n}}(x)$ is the same for all $n=1,2,..N$ as my checked from Matlab simulation results.
The minimum PDF of the unknown distance between A and B$_n$, denoted by $f_{d_{{\rm AB}_{min}}}(x)$. To do this, I tried to compute $F_{d_{{\rm AB}_{min}}}(y) = \Pr[\min\{d_{{\rm AB}_n}\}<y]$ and $f_{d_{{\rm AB}_{min}}}(y) =\frac{ \partial F_{d_{{\rm AB}_{min}}}(y)}{\partial y}$ with the aim of using the obtained PDF $f_{d_{{\rm AB}_n}}(x)$. However, from the figure below, I observe that $d_{{\rm AB}_n}$ is correlated at A. In other words, all random variables $d_{{\rm AB}_n}$ are dependent. Thus, I cannot extract the probability above according to the independent case as \begin{align} F_{d_{{\rm AB}_{min}}}(y) &= \Pr[\min\{d_{{\rm AB}_n}\}<y] = 1 - \Pr[\min\{d_{{\rm AB}_n}\}>y] = \Pr[d_{{\rm AB}_1}>y,...,d_{{\rm AB}_n}>y,...,d_{{\rm AB}_N}>y]\\ &\ne 1-\prod_{n=1}^N(1-F_{d_{{\rm AB}_n}}(x)) = 1-(1-F_{d_{{\rm AB}_n}}(x))^N. \end{align} So, in this case, could you please recommend a way to solve the problem of the probability above? Approximation or Asymptotic methods are also ok with me.
Thank you for your enthusiasm!

A) The problem can be scaled to have the red circle unitary
Being either A and the B points distributed uniformly inside the circle, then using polar coordinates the pdf of any point will be $$ \Pr \left( {{\rm A}{\rm ,B}} \right)\; \sim \;\frac{r}{{\pi R^2 }}drd\alpha = \frac{1}{\pi }\frac{r}{R}d\left( {\frac{r}{R}} \right)d\alpha = \quad \left| \begin{array}{l} \;0 < \frac{r}{R} \le 1 \\ \; - \pi < \alpha \le \pi \\ \end{array} \right. $$ and in fact $$ \int\limits_{0 < \frac{r}{R} \le 1} {\int\limits_{ - \pi < \alpha \le \pi } {\Pr \left( {{\rm A}{\rm ,B}} \right)} } = \frac{1}{\pi }\int\limits_{0 < \frac{r}{R} \le 1} {\int\limits_{ - \pi < \alpha \le \pi } {\frac{r}{R}d\left( {\frac{r}{R}} \right)d\alpha } } = \frac{{2\pi }}{\pi }\frac{1}{2} = 1 $$
So in the proceeding let's understand the radii to be standardized by $R$. as above
B) The point A can be rotated onto the $x$ axis
Clearly, wlog, the point A can be taken to lay on the $x$ axis, at a standardized coordinate $\rho$, with pdf $$ \Pr \left( {\rm A} \right) \sim 2\rho \,d\rho $$
C) B distances wrt A
The distance of $B_k$ from A, always standardized, reads $$ \begin{array}{l} d_k = \left\| {{\rm AB}_k } \right\| = \sqrt {\left( {r_k \cos \alpha _k - \rho } \right)^2 + r_k ^2 \sin ^2 \alpha _k } = \sqrt {\left( {r_k ^2 - 2\rho \cos \alpha _k + \rho ^2 } \right)} = \\ = \sqrt {r_k ^2 + \rho ^2 } \sqrt {\left( {1 - \frac{{2\rho }}{{\sqrt {r_k ^2 + \rho ^2 } }}\cos \alpha _k } \right)} \\ \end{array} $$
D) Prob given $\rho$
Now we can level out $\alpha$ to find the probability of $d_k$ given $\rho$, and we have better to express that as CDF.
But the integration bounds on $\alpha$ depend on $d_k$, besides on $\rho$ as illustrated in the sketch below
So,
We will obtain a piecewise CDF and as such we shall insert it into {Extreme value computation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_value_theory).
I am not going here into the relevant detailed computation.
Once we have the probability of the minmum $d $ given $\rho$, and the probability of $\rho$ as in B), then it is a matter to integrate over $\rho$ their product.