The problem is as follows:
The horizontal range of a bullet fired by a rifle from a certain height above sea level is given by the minimum value of the function presented below:
$$f(x)=2\sec\left(\pi x-\frac{\pi}{4}\right)+1$$
in kilometers when, $-\frac{1}{12}\leq x \leq \frac{5}{12}$
With the given information, find the length attained by the bullet.
The alternatives given in my workbook are as follows:
$\begin{array}{ll} 1.&\textrm{4 km}\\ 2.&\textrm{1 km}\\ 3.&\textrm{3 km}\\ 4.&\textrm{2 km}\\ \end{array}$
What I attempted to do in order to solve this problem was to use the given domain to reconstruct the function and hence having the range, and with that minimum value I can get what it is being asked. In other words the horizontal range of that bullet.
Since the domain is in this:
$-\frac{1}{12}\leq x \leq \frac{5}{12}$
Then:
$-\frac{\pi}{12}\leq \pi x \leq \frac{5\pi}{12}$
$-\frac{\pi}{12}\leq \pi x \leq \frac{5\pi}{12}$
$-\frac{\pi}{12}-\frac{\pi}{4}\leq \pi x - \frac{\pi}{4} \leq \frac{5\pi}{12}-\frac{\pi}{4}$
$-\frac{4\pi}{12}\leq \pi x - \frac{\pi}{4} \leq \frac{2\pi}{12}$
$-\frac{\pi}{3}\leq \pi x - \frac{\pi}{4} \leq \frac{\pi}{6}$
Now here's where it comes the source of controversy.
I'm assuming that I can "take the secant function" to that interval in order to get the range.
Which would yield.
$\sec\left(-\frac{\pi}{3}\right)\leq \sec \left(\pi x - \frac{\pi}{4}\right) \leq \sec \left(\frac{\pi}{6}\right)$
Since the negative sign is absorved by the secant function this will generate:
$2 \leq \sec \left(\pi x - \frac{\pi}{4}\right) \leq \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}$
$4 \leq 2\sec \left(\pi x - \frac{\pi}{4}\right) \leq 2\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}$
$4 +1 \leq 2\sec \left(\pi x - \frac{\pi}{4}\right)+1 \leq \frac{2 \cdot 2}{\sqrt{3}}+1$
The finally:
$5 \leq 2\sec \left(\pi x - \frac{\pi}{4}\right)+1 \leq \frac{4}{\sqrt{3}}+1$
But rewritting this doing the rationalization it would be:
$5 \leq f(x) \geq \frac{4\sqrt{3}+3}{3}$
Now:
$\frac{4\sqrt{3}+3}{3} \approx 3.3094$
But looking at the orientation of the signs it doesn't make sense. How it can possibly be that this result is greater than $4$? What went wrong here?.
Can someone help me here?. Or is it just that I did not got the right picture?.
I can spot that $4\,km$ appears in one of the choices But I have no idea if whether I got to the right answer or some critical concept I missunderstood here. Thus I require help to settle down this contradiction. Help please?. I'd also like to know that since I got this problem in my precalculus workbook I'd like that the answer would follow the similar approach given here and not use derivatives.
Hint: a simpler way for solving this problem is taking the derivative of the function and after taking the value of $x$ such that $y$ of the line is mininum.