How much novelty is there in spectral theory over Clifford algebras?

48 Views Asked by At

Asking here seems like the most efficient way of getting an answer. Maybe I'll get an opinion from a relevant expert.

A demonstration of my idea is to take the Takagi decomposition:

Given a complex-symmetric matrix (i.e., one which satisfies $M = M^T$) there exists a unitary matrix $U$ and non-negative real diagonal matrix $D$ such that $M = UDU^T$.

Take note that $U^T \neq U^{-1}$, so this is not a diagonalisation of a linear map, but of a bilinear form.

What I've noticed is that if I extend the scalars to include a number $\delta$ satisfying:

$$\delta^2 = 0, \delta^* = \delta, \delta i = -i\delta$$ so that we get the algebra $\mathbb R + \mathbb Ri + \mathbb R\delta + \mathbb Ri\delta$ equipped with an involution denoted $*$. We have that:

  • $M\delta$ is Hermitian when $M$ is complex-symmetric.
  • From the equation $M = U D U^T$, we get $M \delta = UDU^T\delta = U(D\delta)U^*$. So $M \delta$ is unitarily diagonalisable.
  • A unitary diagonalisation of $M \delta$ yields a Takagi decomposition of $M$.

I can subsequently prove the Takagi decomposition by ring restriction.

A similar trick can prove the $\mathbb R$-SVD, skew-symmetric $\mathbb C$-Takagi, and some matrix decompositions over the quaternions $\mathbb H$ and dual numbers $\mathbb R[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2)$.

Is this widely known? Dare I ask whether it's at all interesting?