Parameterization of a circle of radius 2 in polar coordinates is not what I would expect

67 Views Asked by At

I am trying to represent the circle of radius 2 in polar coordinates.

$$\gamma(t)=(2\cos(t),2\sin(t))$$

where $t\in [0,2\pi]$. The derivative would be

$$\gamma'(t)=-2\sin(t)\partial_x +2\cos(t)\partial_y.$$

Now if we convert the tangent basis vectors to polar coordinates,

$$\partial_x = \cos(t)\partial_r - \frac{1}{r}\sin(t) \partial_\theta.$$

$$\partial_y = \sin(t)\partial_r + \frac{1}{r}\cos(t) \partial_\theta.$$

Then under the substitution, noting that $r=2$, we have

$$\gamma'(t) = -2\sin(t)\partial_x + 2\cos(t) \partial_y\\= -2\sin(t)\left[\cos(t)\partial_r - \frac{1}{2}\sin(t) \partial_\theta\right] + 2\cos(t)\left[\sin(t)\partial_r + \frac{1}{2}\cos(t) \partial_\theta\right]\\=2\partial_\theta.$$

Thus, in polar coordinates, $\gamma'(t) = 2\partial_\theta$.

Now, what I thought is that in polar coordiantes,

$$\gamma_{\text{polar}}(t) = (2, t)$$ where $t\in [0,2\pi]$.

Then we would have $$\gamma'_{\text{polar}}(t)=\partial_\theta.$$

But this does not align with what I found when I started with cartesian coordiantes. What am I doing wrong?