Proving Kummer's Transformation

1.3k Views Asked by At

I'm working with a Kummer equation of the form:

$z\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial z^2}+(b-z)\frac{\partial w}{\partial z} -aw=0,$

which is solved by Kummer's Confluent Hypergeometric function:

${}_{1}F_{1}(a,b,z)=M(a,b,z).$

There is an identity, called Kummer's transformation, which states that:

$M(a,b,z)=e^{z}M(b-a,b,-z).$

I can currently prove this using the integral form of Kummer's equation:

$M(a,b,z)=\frac{\Gamma(b)}{\Gamma(b-a)\Gamma(a)}\int\limits_{0}^{1}e^{zt}t^{a-1}(1-t)^{b-a-1}\mathrm{d}t \text{, for }b>a>0.$

But this is only valid under the conditions $b>a>0$. I have not found any source that quotes these same conditions for the transformation so I assume it can be proved by some other means. Any ideas?

Cheers,

Hamzaan