Representation of stochastic integral w.r.t. semimartingale with finitely many jumps in finite time

241 Views Asked by At

In the book "Semimartingale theory and Stochastic Calculus" from He, Wang and Yan I found the following integration by parts formula for semimartingales (Theorem 9.33):

If $X$ and $Y$ are semimartingales then, $$X_tY_t = \int_0^t X_{s-} \text{d} Y_s + \int_0^t Y_{s-} \text d X_s + X_0Y_0 + \langle X^c, Y^c\rangle _t + \sum_{s\le t} \Delta X_s \Delta Y_s$$ where $X_{s-} := \lim_{r\nearrow s} X_s$ and $X^c$ denotes the continuous part of $X$, $\langle \rangle_t $ is the quadratic variation and $\Delta X_s := X_s - X_{s-}$. In my application I have given the case that $Y$ is in fact purely discontinuous and both $X$ and $Y$ have finitely many jumps up to a time $t>0$.

In this case I conjecture that $$X_tY_t = X_0Y_0 + \int_0^t Y_{s-} \text d X_s^c + \sum_{s\le t} \Delta (XY) _s$$

In my calculation by intuition I assumed the following: $$\int_0^tX_{s-} \text dY_s = \sum_{s\le t}X_{s-} \Delta Y_s \quad\text{and}\quad \int_0^t Y_{s-} \text d X_s = \int_0^t Y_{s-}\text dX_s^c + \sum_{s\le t} Y_{s-} \Delta X_s$$ Is this true? If yes, how can I prove it? The reason must be that there are just finitly many jumps.

Edit: I searched in the book but the definition of purely discontinuous is not clear to me. Anyway, may I just state the particular situation I work with: Let us take the definition of pure jump type from here. Then in my case $X = M + A$, where $M$ is a local martingale (possibly with jumps) and $Y,A$ are pure jump type. Unfortunately, I really want to use this integration by parts formula.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

3
On

I think what you conjectured would be true if $Y$ is a pure jump process, but the condition of a purely discontinuous $Y$ is too weak. Indeed, $Y$ is purely discontinuous if and only if $\langle Y\rangle$ is a pure jump process (by definition). However, we can easily find examples in which $Y$ is purely discontinuous and has finitely many jumps but $\mathrm dY^c\ne 0$ on some intervals. For example, consider a degenerate case (i.e., $Y_t(\omega)$ is given by $Y(t)$ below almost surely): $$Y(t)=\begin{cases}t, &\text{if }0\le t<1\\t+1, &\text{otherwise}\end{cases}$$ It is easy to verify that $$\langle Y\rangle_t=\begin{cases}0, &\text{if }0\le t<1\\1,&\text{otherwise}\end{cases},$$ which is a pure jump process, and so $Y$ is purely discontinuous. In this case, we have $\mathrm d Y^c_t=1$ for each $t>0$. Notice that $Y$ exhibits finitely many jumps (indeed only one jump) almost surely for $t>1$.

0
On

As far as I understand it, finitely many jumps implicated pure jump type of the discontinuous part, so we can do the following. Let $H$ be a cadlag process and $Z$ a semimartingale of purejump type with finitely many jumps in $[0,t]$. Define $t_k^n := \frac k n \wedge t$ for $k\in\Bbb N_0$. Then by Theorem 9.29 of that book I cited in the question we have the following well-known fact:

$$\sum_{i=0}^\infty H_{t_i^n} ( X_{t_{i+1}^n} - X_{t_i^n}) \overset{\Bbb P}{\longrightarrow} \int_0^t H_{s-} \text dX_s$$

On the other hand, fix $\omega \in \Omega$. $X (\omega)$ has finitely many jumps on $[0,t]$. Denote them by $0< s_1 < \ldots < s_m$. We have that $\max_{i\in\Bbb N _0} |t_{i+1}^n - t^n_i| \to 0$ as $n\to \infty$. Therefore there exists $N$ s.t. $\forall n \ge N $ we have $$\forall k=1,\ldots, m \quad (s_k \in (t_i^n , t^n_{i+1}] \Rightarrow s_l \notin (t_i^n , t^n_{i+1}]\; \forall l \neq k)$$ Define $t^n (s) := \sup \{ t_i^n : t_i^n < s \} $. Note that $t^n(s) \nearrow$ s. Then for $n\ge N$ $$\sum_{i=0}^\infty H_{t_i^n} (\omega) ( X_{t_{i+1}^n}(\omega) - X_{t_i^n}(\omega)) = \sum_{k=1}^m H_{t^n (s_k)} (\omega) (X_{s_k}(\omega) - X_{s_k-}(\omega)) \\ \longrightarrow \sum_{k=1}^m H_{s_k -} (\omega) (X_{s_k}(\omega) - X_{s_k-}(\omega)) = \sum_{s\leq t} H_{s-}(\omega) \Delta X_{s}(\omega)$$ Therefore $$\int_0^t H_{s-} \text dX_s =\sum_{s\leq t} H_{s-} \Delta X_{s}$$

This implies what I assumed in my calculation because $\Delta X = \Delta X^d$.