Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$ be a measurable space and $C_1, C_2 \subset \mathcal{P}(\Omega)$. Then, we know that $C_1 \subset C_2 \implies \sigma(C_1) \subset \sigma(C_2)$, where $$ \sigma(A) := \bigcap \{ \mathcal{B}: \mathcal{B} \text{ is a } \sigma\text{-algebra containing } A \} $$ is the generated $\sigma$-algebra of $A \subset \mathcal{P}(\Omega)$. Does the converse also hold?
Since in our lecture, we only formulated one direction, I would be surprised if both directions worked, but haven't been able to come up with a counterexample.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
I assume here your "$\subset$" means "$\subseteq$" (containment) and not "$\subsetneq$" (proper containment).
Assuming this, then it's not true. Suppose $S$ is an element of $\sigma(C_2)$ which is not actually already in $C_2$, and define $C_1 = C_2\cup \{S\}$.
Then $\sigma(C_1)=\sigma(C_2)$, so $ \sigma(C_1)\subset \sigma(C_2)$, but $C_1\not\subset C_2$.