In the question: Inverse limit of modules and tensor product, Matt E gives an example where inverse limits and tensor products do not commute over the base ring $\mathbb{Z}$. He then goes on to show that it does hold if one takes a limit over modules of finite length and tensors with a finitely presented module. Are there counterexamples in the category of vector spaces over a field $k$ (not necessarily finite dimensional of course)?
2026-04-13 17:59:05.1776103145
Tensor products over field do not commute with inverse limits?
1.9k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in EXAMPLES-COUNTEREXAMPLES
- A congruence with the Euler's totient function and sum of divisors function
- Seeking an example of Schwartz function $f$ such that $ \int_{\bf R}\left|\frac{f(x-y)}{y}\right|\ dy=\infty$
- Inner Product Uniqueness
- Metric on a linear space is induced by norm if and only if the metric is homogeneous and translation invariant
- Why do I need boundedness for a a closed subset of $\mathbb{R}$ to have a maximum?
- A congruence with the Euler's totient function and number of divisors function
- Analysis Counterexamples
- A congruence involving Mersenne numbers
- If $\|\ f \|\ = \max_{|x|=1} |f(x)|$ then is $\|\ f \|\ \|\ f^{-1}\|\ = 1$ for all $f\in \mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^m,\mathbb{R}^n)$?
- Unbounded Feasible Region
Related Questions in TENSOR-PRODUCTS
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Inclusions in tensor products
- How to prove that $f\otimes g: V\otimes W\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism
- What does a direct sum of tensor products look like?
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
- Tensor modules of tensor algebras
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- Algebraic Tensor product of Hilbert spaces
- Why $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to+\infty}x_n\otimes y_n=x\otimes y\;?$
- Proposition 3.7 in Atiyah-Macdonald (Tensor product of fractions is fraction of tensor product)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes. Take a field $k$. Then $k[[t]]$ is (isomorphic to) the product of infinitely many copies of $k$. If $V = k^\infty$ is an infinite dimensional space, then the canonical map $k[[t]] \otimes_k V \to V[[t]] \simeq \prod_{n=1}^\infty k \otimes V$is not an isomorphism: its image is the subspace of elements of the product such that the coefficients span a finite dimensional subspace of $V$.
Indeed, elements of its image are of the form $x(t) = \sum_{k=1}^d R_k(t) \otimes v_k$ where $R_k$ are power series and $v_k \in V$, and the coefficients of $x$ are in the vector space $\mathrm{Span}(v_1, \dots, v_d)$ which is finite dimensional. On the other hand, if $(e_i)$ is a basis of $k^\infty$, then $\sum_{i=1}^\infty e_i t^i$ is not in the image.
This example is the motivation for the definition of the completed tensor product, by the way.