I have some confusion regarding the definition of vector fields and how they act on smooth functions and 1-forms. Let $M$ be a smooth manifold. Let $X$ be a smooth vector field on $M$ and let $f \in C^{\infty}(M)$. The action of $X$ on $f$ is given by $$ Xf = X^i \frac{df}{dx^i} \in C^{\infty}(M) $$ Thus, applying $X$ to a $C^{\infty}$ function (0-form) produces another $C^{\infty}$ function. However, it was my understanding that a vector field may be thought of as a rank 1 contravariant tensor field. Thus, I would expect that a vector field would be defined by $X : \Omega^1(M) \rightarrow C^{\infty}(M)$, i.e. applying $X$ to a 1-form would produce another $C^{\infty}$ function. It is certainly the case that applying a 1-form $df$ to a vector field $X$ produces a $C^{\infty}$ function via $$ df(X) = X^i \frac{df}{dx^i} $$ so why does it not seem to be the case in the opposite direction? Am I misunderstanding something about vector fields?
2026-04-01 20:08:51.1775074131
Can vector fields be thought of as rank-1 contravariant tensor fields?
429 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-FORMS
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Integration of one-form
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
- How to find 1-form for Stokes' Theorem?
- Verify the statement about external derivative.
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- form value on a vector field
Related Questions in TENSORS
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- tensor differential equation
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- What is this notation?
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Generalization of chain rule to tensors
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- $n$-dimensional quadratic equation $(Ax)x + Bx + c = 0$
- What's the best syntax for defining a matrix/tensor via its indices?
Related Questions in VECTOR-FIELDS
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- In a directional slope field, how can a straight line be a solution to a differential equation?
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- If $\nabla X=h \cdot \text{Id}_{TM}$ for a vector field $X$ and $h \in C^{\infty}(M)$, is $h$ constant?
- Equivalent definition of vector field over $S^2$
- Study of a " flow "
- Extension of a gradient field
- how to sketch the field lines of $F(x,y)=(\sin y,-\sin x)$?
- Is a vector field a mathematical field?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Question: "..so why does it not seem to be the case in the opposite direction? Am I misunderstanding something about vector fields?"
Answer: If $M$ is connected the Serre-Swan theorem says (wikipedia)
"Another way of stating the above is that for any connected smooth manifold M, the section functor Γ from the category of smooth vector bundles over M to the category of finitely generated, projective C∞(M)-modules is full, faithful, and essentially surjective. Therefore the category of smooth vector bundles on M is equivalent to the category of finitely generated, projective C∞(M)-modules. Details may be found in (Nestruev 2003)."
You may use the Serre-Swan theorem to prove the following:
Example: If $\Omega^1:=\Omega^1(M)$ is the module of smooth sections of the cotangent bundle on $M$ and $R:=C^{\infty}(M)$ the ring of smooth real-valued functions on $M$, $T$ the module of sections of the tangent bundle $T(M)$ of $M$ it follows $\Omega^1, T$ are finite rank projective $R$-modules and there is an isomorphisn
$$\rho: T\cong Hom_R(\Omega^1, R),$$
hence for any global vector field $X: R \rightarrow R$ there is an $R$-linear map $\phi_X: \Omega^1 \rightarrow R$ with $\phi_X \circ d =X$. Here $d: R \rightarrow \Omega^1$ maps a smooth function $f$ to its differential form $df$. You must write down the map $\rho$ and understand why it is an isomorphism. For a connected manifold $M$, the module $\Omega^1$ is finite rank and projective and it follows
$$(\Omega^1)^{**}\cong T^* \cong \Omega^1.$$