Clarification on notation from a probabilty/quantum mechanics question

136 Views Asked by At

I'm working through Stephen Barnett's book on quantum information and have come across the following question (1.5, for anyone keeping track at home)

A particle counter records counts with an efficiency $\eta$. This means that each particle is detected with probability $\eta$ and missed with probability $1-\eta$. Let $N$ be the number of particles present and $n$ be the number detected. Show that

$$P(n|N) = \frac{N!}{(N-n)!n!}\eta^n(1-\eta)^{N-n}$$ [I did this part, no problem]

a) Calculate P(N|n) for

$$P(N) = e^{-\bar{N}}\frac{\bar{N}^N}{N!}$$

b) Calculate P(N|n) for all P(N) equally probable

c) Calculate P(N|n) given only that the mean number of particles present is $\bar{N}$.

My questions:

  1. What does $P(N)$ denote? I recognize that question $a)$ is the Poisson distribution, so I assume that it's the probability of $N$ particles being detected, given a mean of $\bar{N}$. But this conflicts with the information in the first paragraph... It seems like $N$ is being used as a constant in the first paragraph, and now as a variable in the question.

  2. Does $P(N|n)$ mean "the probability that $N$ particles are detected, given that $n$ are"?

  3. Doesn't question $c)$ conflict with the fact that the first paragraph says that $N$ particles are present?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

4
On
  1. For ease of notation, let's relabel so that $Q$ is the number of particles present and $R$ is the number of particles observed. Then they are asking for $P(Q=q \mid R=r)$, which is $\frac{P(Q=q \wedge R=r)}{P(R=r)}=\frac{P(Q=q \wedge R=r)}{\sum_{s=r}^\infty P(Q=s \wedge R=r)}$.
  2. Sticking to the above notation, the meaning of $P(Q=q \mid R=r)$ is "the probability that there are $q$ particles present given that $r$ particles were observed". This is really the quantity that you would care about if you were trying to estimate how many particles were there by using an error-prone detector. Ideally it would be nearly $1$ for $q=r$ and nearly zero for all other values of $q$ with fixed $r$.
  3. All three of a,b,c are dropping the assumption that $N$ is a given number, and setting it to be a random variable instead. (However, I don't really know what the problem expects you to do in parts b and c.)