I am doing the curvature correction of the object boundary, I need to calcluate the maximum height perpendicular to the arc shown in the figure. I know the chord length and arc length, But i don't know the radius of the arc. I would like to know how to find out the maximum height perpendicular to the the arc if we have only two parameters like W and A. Please help me to solve this problem. Thanks in advance.
how to find the maximum height perpendicular to arc without knowing radius of the arc
1.1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 3 best solutions below
On
As Aretino answered, to solve for $\theta$ equation $$f(\theta)=\frac{\sin(\theta)} \theta-a=0$$ you will need a numerical method and Newton will probably be the simplest. Personally, I would prefer to consider $$g(\theta)=\sin(\theta)-a \theta=0$$ You could be interested by this post.
Using Newton method with a reasonable guess $\theta_0$, it will be updated according to
$$\theta_{n+1}=\theta_n-\frac{g(\theta_n)}{g'(x_n)}$$ which will then be $$\theta_{n+1}=\frac{\sin (\theta_n )-\theta_n \cos (\theta_n )}{a-\cos (\theta_n )}$$
For the starting guess, you could use the beautiful approximation $$\sin(\theta) \simeq \frac{16 (\pi -\theta) \theta}{5 \pi ^2-4 (\pi -\theta) \theta}\qquad (0\leq \theta\leq\pi)$$ proposed by Mahabhaskariya of Bhaskara I, a seventh-century Indian mathematician (have a look here). Solving the quadratic will give $$\theta_0= \frac{2 \sqrt{2 \pi a+4-\pi ^2 a^2}+\pi a-4}{2 a}$$ and Newton method would converge in very few iterations.
For illustration purposes, let us use $a=0.5$. The iterates will then be $$\left( \begin{array}{cc} n & \theta_n \\ 0 & 1.8947720683167907653 \\ 1 & 1.8954945691081046778 \\ 2 & 1.8954942670340337422 \\ 3 & 1.8954942670339809471 \end{array} \right)$$ which is the solution for $20$ significant figures.
Doing the same with $a=0.9$ would give $$\left( \begin{array}{cc} n & \theta_n \\ 0 & 0.78035069742025663946 \\ 1 & 0.78675773101028416327 \\ 2 & 0.78668308222856641907 \\ 3 & 0.78668307204921216197 \\ 4 & 0.78668307204921197269 \end{array} \right)$$
Doing the same with $a=0.1$ would give $$\left( \begin{array}{cc} n & \theta_n \\ 0 & 2.8537061060216672396 \\ 1 & 2.8523421443538252996 \\ 2 & 2.8523418944501000631 \\ 3 & 2.8523418944500916483 \end{array} \right)$$
Uou could also be interested by the Padé approximation $$\frac{\sin(\theta)} \theta\approx \frac{1-\frac{53 }{396}\theta^2+\frac{551 }{166320}\theta^4 } {1+\frac{13 }{396}\theta^2+\frac{5 }{11088} \theta^4}$$ which let you with a quadratic in $\theta^2$ for a final solution $$\theta= \sqrt{6} \sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{35} \sqrt{-3985 a^2+130862 a+25583}-455 a-1855}{75 a-551}}$$ For the worked examples, the values are $1.89552$, $0.786683$ and $2.85381$.
Similar to the Padé approximant, we also could write $$\frac{\sin(\theta)} \theta\approx \frac{1+a\theta^2+b\theta^4 } {1+c\theta^2+d\theta^4}$$ and impose that the values of the function, its first and second derivative be strictly identical at $\theta=0$ and $\theta=\pi$, we should have $$a=\frac{2}{\pi ^2}-\frac{1}{3}\qquad b=-\frac{1+\left(\frac{2}{\pi ^2}+\frac{1}{3}\right) \pi ^2}{\pi ^4}\qquad c=\frac{2}{\pi ^2}-\frac{1}{6}\qquad d=\frac{10-\pi ^2}{2 \pi ^4}$$ For the worked examples, the values are $1.89530$, $0.786645$ and $2.85232$.
If you just need a very crude estimate for starting Newton iterations, you could also use $$\frac{\sin(\theta)} \theta\approx \frac{1}{3} \left(1+2 \cos \left(\frac{2 \theta }{3}\right)\right)\implies \theta =\frac{3}{2} \cos ^{-1}\left(\frac{3 a-1}{2} \right)$$ For the worked examples, the values are $1.97717$, $0.832217$ and $2.89255$.
On
Here's the simple solution you're looking for, but it's only an approximation, plus or minus 2 or 3%.
s=sagitta (or height), a=arc length, c=chord length
s = 0.42 * √( a^2 - c^2 )
c = √( a^2 - (s/0.42)^2 )
a = √( c^2 + (s/0.42)^2 )
If the arc is more like a full semi-circle (where radius=sagitta), then the constant will be a little closer to 0.4127. If the arc is more flat (very large radius), then the constant will be closer to 0.43. But these are minor differences for an approximation.

If $\theta$ is half the center angle (in radians) subtended by the arc ($0\le\theta\le\pi$), and $R$ the arc radius, then we have: $$ A=2R\theta,\quad W=2R\sin\theta,\quad \hbox{and}\quad H=R(1-\cos\theta). $$ Dividing the second equation by the first one gets $$ {\sin\theta\over\theta}={W\over A}, \quad\hbox{that is:}\quad \mathop{\rm{sinc}}\theta={W\over A}. $$ This equation has a unique solution $\theta\in(0,\pi)$, if $0<W/A<1$ (as it should be), but there is no commonly defined name for the inverse of the sinc function. The value of $\theta$ must then usually be found by some numerical method.
Once you find $\theta$, just plug it into the first equation to get $R$ and then use the third equation to find $H$.