Can any one explain me what is lorentz transformation and how is this different from orthogonal transformation. How to perform lorentz transformation on cartesian co-ordinates ?
How to perform lorentz transformation on Cartesian coordinates $x= [x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4]$
377 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 3 best solutions below
On
Special Relativity says that when objects are in motion space gets stretched and time gets shortened (from what it usually would be if it was at rest). Given four coordinates, a transformation (or a linear map) between any other 4 coordinates can be thought of as a 4x4 matrix. Given a speed that your reference frame is moving (with respect to your rest frame) and a direction that your frame is moving in, the Lorentz transformation is a 4x4 matrix which you can multiply your coordinates by to get the elongated or shortened coordinates viewed from a rest frame.
An orthogonal map is a matrix that just rotates the coordinates but does not change anything else unlike a Lorentz transformation because Lorentz transformations change the size of an object in the direction of motion more than in other directions.
On
An example of a Lorentz transformation for two inertial frames with relative velocity $v$ in the $x$ direction is: \begin{equation*} \left[ \begin{matrix} x' \\ y' \\ z' \\ ct' \\ \end{matrix} \right] = \left[ \begin{matrix} \cosh\theta & 0 & 0 & \sinh\theta \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \sinh\theta & 0 & 0 & \cosh\theta \end{matrix} \right] \left[ \begin{matrix} x \\ y \\ z \\ ct \end{matrix} \right] \end{equation*} where $\theta = \tanh^{-1}(v/c)$.
Superficially, this looks almost like a rotation matrix, except that it uses hyperbolic trig functions instead of normal trig functions. From that analogy, you might also be led to rediscover the invariance of $c^2 t^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2$ under Lorentz transformations - as opposed to the invariance of $x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2$ under orthogonal transformations.
In the Cartesian plane with coordinates $(x, y)$, and with $\theta$ denoting a real number, a rotation has the form $$ R_{\theta}\left[\begin{array}{@{}c@{}} x \\ y \\ \end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{@{}rr@{}} \cos\theta & -\sin\theta \\ \sin\theta & \cos\theta \\ \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{@{}c@{}} x \\ y \\ \end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{@{}c@{}} x\cos\theta - y\sin\theta \\ x\sin\theta + y\cos\theta \\ \end{array}\right], $$ while a boost has the form $$ B_{\theta}\left[\begin{array}{@{}c@{}} x \\ y \\ \end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{@{}rr@{}} \cosh\theta & \sinh\theta \\ \sinh\theta & \cosh\theta \\ \end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{@{}c@{}} x \\ y \\ \end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{@{}c@{}} x\cosh\theta + y\sinh\theta \\ x\sinh\theta + y\cosh\theta \\ \end{array}\right]. $$ A rotation preserves the Euclidean metric $dx^{2} + dy^{2}$, while a boost preserves the Lorentz metric $-dx^{2} + dy^{2}$.
In four-dimensional space, analogously, a rotation preserves the Euclidean metric $$ dx_{1}^{2} + dx_{2}^{2} + dx_{3}^{2} + dx_{4}^{2}, $$ while (modulo the choice of timelike coordinate) a Lorentz transformation preserves the metric $$ -dx_{1}^{2} + dx_{2}^{2} + dx_{3}^{2} + dx_{4}^{2}. $$ Writing down a general rotation or Lorentz transformation is not as pleasant as in the plane, but the situation in the plane conveys the general flavor of the distinction.