I'm trying to prove https://imomath.com/index.cgi?page=inversion (Problem 11) by projective geometry:
If seven vertices of a (quadrilaterally-faced) hexahedron lie on a sphere, then so does the eighth vertex.
Is it suffice to prove: If seven vertices of a (quadrilaterally-faced) hexahedron lie on a quadric surface, then so does the eighth vertex?
The projective proposition (B) is easy to prove, much easier than the original (sphere) one (A).
I believe B implies A in this case, but I don't think it as easy as "A is a special case of B, so B implies A".
Think about the converse of Pascal's theorem: ..., then 6 vertices lie on a conic. We can't change it to "..., then 6 vertices lie on a circle". The correct one should be: "..., and 5 vertices lie on a circle, then so does the 6th vertex".
But this problem is a slight different than the converse of Pascal's theorem (the circle version): 5 vertices determine a conic, but 7 vertices is not enough to determine a quadratic surface.
I think that OP's strategy can be made to work.
The following is excerpted from Salmon, Analytical Geometry of Three Dimensions, pg 130, Article 131.
Let's refer to the set of all quadrics $U +\lambda V +\mu W$ as the net $N$ generated by $U, V, W$. The net $N$, which contains all quadrics passing through the eight intersection points of $U,V,W$ will in particular contain the three degenerate quadrics consisting of two planes corresponding to opposite faces of the given hexahedron. The intersection of the three degenerate quadrics will be the vertices of the hexahedron, and thus all eight hexahedron vertices lie on all members of $N$.
If I've argued this correctly I think we can state that:
Since a sphere is a special case of a quadric, the theorem holds for a sphere and a hexahedron.