We consider formal power series over a field. Power series such as $x+x^2+ x^3 +\cdots$ can be expressed as fraction of polynomials where the denominator is a unit in the power series ring. There are many other examples that we can construct. Does there exist a power series which cannot written as fraction of polynomials? Are there are some explicit examples?
2026-03-26 21:25:43.1774560343
Is a formal power series a fraction of polynomials?
143 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in FIELD-THEORY
- Square classes of a real closed field
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Proving addition is associative in $\mathbb{R}$
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible for an infinite field that does not contain a subfield isomorphic to $\Bbb Q$?
- Proving that the fraction field of a $k[x,y]/(f)$ is isomorphic to $k(t)$
- Finding a generator of GF(16)*
- Operator notation for arbitrary fields
- Studying the $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ when $p(x)$ is any degree.
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
Related Questions in EXAMPLES-COUNTEREXAMPLES
- A congruence with the Euler's totient function and sum of divisors function
- Seeking an example of Schwartz function $f$ such that $ \int_{\bf R}\left|\frac{f(x-y)}{y}\right|\ dy=\infty$
- Inner Product Uniqueness
- Metric on a linear space is induced by norm if and only if the metric is homogeneous and translation invariant
- Why do I need boundedness for a a closed subset of $\mathbb{R}$ to have a maximum?
- A congruence with the Euler's totient function and number of divisors function
- Analysis Counterexamples
- A congruence involving Mersenne numbers
- If $\|\ f \|\ = \max_{|x|=1} |f(x)|$ then is $\|\ f \|\ \|\ f^{-1}\|\ = 1$ for all $f\in \mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^m,\mathbb{R}^n)$?
- Unbounded Feasible Region
Related Questions in FORMAL-POWER-SERIES
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- Finding the period of decimal
- Jacobson radical of formal power series over an integral domain
- Proof of existence of an inverse formal power series
- Proof of homomorphism property of the exponential function for formal power series
- formal power series ring over field is m-adic complete
- Let $F[[X]]$ be the ring of formal power series over the field $F$. Show that $(X)$ is a maximal ideal.
- Power Series Arithmetic through Formal Power Series
- Diagonal power series is holonomic
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You are asking for a formal power series which is not rational. In fact almost all formal power series are irrational, closely analogous to how almost all real numbers are irrational. There are many ways to write down counterexamples over different fields; here are a few.
This is a nice exercise and is the precise analogue of the fact that a rational real number must have an eventually periodic decimal expansion. It follows that any formal power series over $\mathbb{F}_q$ which is not eventually periodic is irrational; an easy example is $\sum_{n \ge 0} x^{n^2}$.
This is not explicit but is one way to formalize the idea that "almost all" formal power series are irrational. For example this result applies to $F = \mathbb{Q}$.
It follows that any formal power series over $\mathbb{C}$ whose coefficients grow faster than exponentially cannot be rational, such as $\sum_{n \ge 0} n! x^n$. Much more precise versions of this claim can also be proven, e.g. $a_n$ must in fact grow exactly like an exponential times a polynomial so also cannot have any other growth rate (so e.g. $a_n$ can't grow like $\sqrt{n}$ or $\exp(\sqrt{n})$), and $a_n$ must in fact have a very specific closed form that most sequences don't have.
It follows that any formal power series over $\mathbb{Q}$ such that the denominators are divisible by infinitely many primes is irrational, such as $\exp(x) = \sum_{n \ge 0} \frac{x^n}{n!}$ and $\ln (1 + x) = \sum_{n \ge 1} \frac{(-1)^{n-1} x^n}{n}$. Actually these guys are irrational over every field of characteristic $0$ but the proof is a bit trickier.
For the next exercise, say that a power series is lacunary if there are arbitrarily large gaps of zero coefficients between its nonzero coefficients; $\sum_{n \ge 0} x^{n^2}$ is a typical example.
This requires no hypotheses on the ground field so, for example, $\sum_{n \ge 0} x^{n^2}$ is irrational over every field.